FACTS ABOUT INDIAN TERRITORY
BY THOMAS F. MILLARD.
Probably more people now have their eyes turned expectantly
toward the Indian Territory, in anticipation of a settlement within
its boundaries, than to any other part of the world. For many
years this region has seemed to possess extraordinary attractions
to the home-seeker. This widespread sentiment had its beginning
soon after the removal of the five civilized tribes from their
lands east of the Mississippi, and has propagated with truly remarkable
fecundity ever since. The average mortal has only to be debarred
from anywhere, to at once feel his curiosity and desire stimulated.
Scarcely had the Indians settled on their new possessions, than
white intruders, tempted by the fertility of the lands, invaded
the Territory, and here they have remained, notwithstanding all
efforts to eject them.
The settlement
of the Territory in spite of steady opposition, both from the
Indian governments within and the United States government without,
presents a curious anomaly in the development of a country, and
one that may well puzzle the student of such evolution. It must
truly be an unusual attraction that will induce 350,000 intelligent
people to move into a country where they are expressly told they
are not wanted, where they can own no real property, where to
remain means to sacrifice all political rights and absolute exclusion
from participation in affairs of either local or national government,
and where they must live under a constant threat of eviction.
Yet all this has happened. And the reason is not hard to discover.
To say that under such circumstances, the charms of the Territory
have apparently outweighed those of other sections of our broad
domain, is to pay the natural resources of the country a compliment
which would be difficult to parallel.
Is this compliment to the Territory deserved? Well, a fact
is not easy to get around. The great states of Missouri, Kansas,
Texas and Arkansas surround the region originally set aside in
perpetuity for the Indians to live upon and enjoy the fruits thereof.
These states are not lacking in attractions to settlers. Their
resources may properly be termed extraordinary, since they have
sufficed, in the half century they have been included within the
confines of civilization, to attract and hold a population of
approximately eight millions, and there is ample room for twice
as many more. In those states residents have all the advantages
that modern civilization is able to confer. In many of these advantages
the Territory, owing to its peculiar situation, has been deficient.
Yet it has drawn, or, to speak correctly, been unable to exclude,
a population now exceeding, with the tribal citizenship, 400,000,
and thousands of others but await a betterment of conditions,
say rather a removal of the banto join the constantly swelling
tide of immigration. Within the period mentioned, a considerable
segment of the Indian Territory has been alienated, by purchase,
and thrown open to settlement. It detracts no whit from the marvelous
achievement that is the story of Oklahoma, to say that, notwithstanding
comparative disadvantages, the Territory now stands nearly even
with her in material development and population. Oklahoma has
thrown open her doors, and the response of energetic upbuilders
has carried her almost within a decade to the verge of statehood.
With doors that must be forced by those seeking admission, the
Territory has nevertheless kept pace with the vigorous stride
of her friendly rival. The fundamental vitality back of this accomplishment
must be indeed remarkable, even in a land of all on this earth
the most favored by nature.
The reason for the present concentration of the interest of
homeseekers upon this country is to be found in the fact that
in the near future the adverse conditions that have operated in
the Territory are to be amelioriated. The ban is to be removed.
Settlers will no longer have the door slammed in their faces,
or, when once inside, be in perpetual fear of the bouncer. They
may come, and welcome. The lands of the Indians are to be allotted,
and once that is done a large percentage will be available for
occupation. And in view of this prospect, thousands of prospective
immigrants are anxious to ascertain the terms under which the
lands may be obtained. The present territorial possessions of
the five civilized nations comprise approximately 20,000,000 acres.
These lands, which have been held in common, are now to be distributed.
Each Indian citizen to receive a share. Deeds will be issued,
and, under certain restrictions and reservations, the lands will
be thrown open to occupation and tillage under terms that will
afford a reasonable security to the occupant. Owing to the fact
that conditions vary in each of the five nations, separate allotment
treaties were necessary, but the system and spirit of all the
treaties is practically the same. The general theory of the treaties
is to give each tribal citizen his or her fair share of the tribal
estate, and in order to accomplish this the government decided
that it was necessary to classify and appraise the land, according
to their character and value. In all the treaties it was deemed
prudent, for the protection of a people who had not been accustomed
to hold land in severalty, and who were consequently presumed
to be unacquainted with its values, to make a certain homestead
inalienable for at least a generation, and to throw safeguards
around the remainder during a brief period. It becomes important,
therefore, for anyone desiring to settle in the territory upon
any of the tribal lands to be informed fully as to the terms and
conditions imposed by the treaties. While, as I have said, the
treaties differ somewhat in minor details, their general principles
are the same, and an examination of the principal provisions of
one will give an insight into the workings of the others. Let
us, then, take a cursory glance at the terms of the treaty between
the United States government and the Cherokee Nation providing
for the allotment of the national lands.
On a basis of a pro rata division, each Cherokee citizen is
entitled to approximately 110 acres of land, but the method of
equalization adopted by the Dawes Commission will cause a great
variance in the allotments. A citizen who selects comparatively
valuable land, according to the appraisement, will naturally receive
much less than one whose selection embraces land that is comparatively
inferior. It thus happens that allotments in the Cherokee Nation
will probably vary from 80 to 640 acres, according to location.
Improvements are not taken into consideration in the appraisement,
for they go to the credit of the man who made them, and their
value is considered as apart from the natural value of the land.
In all cases, each citizen is given a prior opportunity to claim
the place where he has lived, and which he has probably improved.
When a citizen makes his selection he is required to designate
a homestead equal to 40 acres of the average land in the nation,
and under the provisions of the treaty he cannot alienate this
homestead in any way for 21 years after he secures his deed. Within
this period, this homestead cannot be encumbered, or taken or
seized for debt or any other obligation. All other lands in excess
of the homestead may be alienated at any time after five years,
and valid titles given. It should be borne in mind that, under
no circumstances, as the law is at present, can valid titles be
secured to lands within the Territory until five years after they
are allotted. But the lands may be leased just a soon as the allotment
is made. This section of the treaty, which has now been enacted
into law by Congress, reads as follows:
"Cherokee citizens may rent their allotments
when selected, for a term not to exceed one year for grazing purposes
only, and for a period not to exceed five years for agricultural
purposes, but without any stipulation or obligation to renew the
same; but leases for a longer period than one year for grazing
purposes and for a period longer than five years for agricultural
purposes and for mineral purposes may also be made with the approval
of the Secretary of the Interior, and not otherwise. Any agreement
or lease of any kind or character violative of this section shall
be absolutely void and not susceptible of ratification in any
manner and no rule of estoppel shall ever prevent the assertion
of its invalidity. Cattle grazed upon leased allotments shall
not be liable to any tribal tax, but when cattle are introduced
into the Cherokee Nation and grazed on lands not selected as allotments
by citizens the Secretary of the Interior shall collect from the
owners thereof a reasonable grazing tax for the benefit of the
tribe."
It will be noticed that short leases may be made without the
consent of the Secretary of the Interior, but long leases must
be approved at Washington. No agreement entered into by a Cherokee
citizen prior to the expiration of the time limit to sell his
land as soon as it shall be alienable will be valid. It will be
easily understood that the reason for these restrictions is to
prevent the Indians from selling the land before they have an
idea of its value. However, one great difficulty has been removed.
It will be possible to secure valid leases, for a limited period
without interference from Washington, and an unlimited period
with the consent of the Secretary of the Interior, and under these
leases the lands can be cultivated with as much security of possession
as in any of the states. This is a long step in advance, and an
immense immigration to occupy the millions of acres that have
never felt the plow is sure to come.
For about eight years, now, the Commission to the Five Civilized
Tribes, popularly known as the Dawes Commission, has been preparing
the way to allotment, with the result that the work is nearly
done. The land in the Seminole Nation has been allotted, that
in the Creek Nation is nearing completion, while in the Cherokee,
Choctaw and Chickasaw nations it is rapidly progressing. While
it is at present impossible to fix a date when this tremendous
and difficult labor will be finished, it now seems probable that
another year will suffice. The Secretary of the Interior has been
quoted as saying that the Territory will be thrown open to settlement
within two years, and he knows if anyone does. He probably means
that all deeds will be issued by that time, and all disputed claims
settled. From the time that is done, valid leases can be secured.
One hears in the Territory a great deal of more or less bitter
criticism of the delay of the government in perfecting allotment.
This criticism comes from all classes, but it seems to be founded
rather on impatience than upon dereliction of the Interior Department.
Accusations that every possible means to delay the issuance of
deeds are employed by those in authority are freely bandied about.
It is difficult to determine the justice or injustice of these
charges, but to me they do not seem to be well founded. Perhaps
the most that can be said about the attitude of the government
is that it shows no disposition to accelerate matters beyond the
normal rate of progress. This normal headway will finish the job
in a comparatively short time now.
While the situation respecting land tenure in the Territory
stands in this shape just now, it is highly probable that by the
time the allotment is finished some supplemental legislation will
be enacted, by which the time limits within which titles may not
be conveyed will be modified, or in many cases done away with
altogether. The reason for these limitations has already been
explained. The portion of Indian citizens who are even theoretically
assumed to need a temporary guardian does not exceed 20,000, out
of a total tribal citizenship of about 85,000. This portion consists
chiefly of full-bloods, who have been backward in learning the
ways of the white man. It may be that it will be to the advantage
of this class of Indian, to prevent him from selling his homestead
for a generation, but such a theory can scarcely be assumed to
apply to the practically "white Indians," of mixed blood
who constitute fully three-fourths of the tribal population. These
people are as capable of managing their own business now as they
ever will be, and they deeply resent being tied up as wards in
chancery. They want to be able to do as they please with their
property, and no one who is at all familiar with their situation
will think of denying the justice of their position. It would
be just as reasonable for the government to prevent a Pennsylvania
or Illinois farmer from selling his land on the theory that he
was not capable of managing his own business. I assume that the
Secretary of the Interior and Congress fully realize this, and
will consent to a modification of some of the provisions of the
treaties. The only difficulty in the way of supplementary legislation
is how to determine who is and who is not entitled to exemption.
Two methods have been suggested: The first, that the Territorial
courts be given jurisdiction to determine such competency, on
presentation of evidence; second, that this power be given to
the Secretary of the Interior. Either plan would answer, although
public opinion in the Territory is overwhelmingly in favor of
delegating this office to the courts, as being the most satisfactory
and expedient. At any rate, some legislation of this nature is
looked for, and if it is enacted fully three-fourths of the land
in the Territory will be at once placed on the same footing as
land in any of the state.
Conditions in
the towns are entirely different, being regulated by separate
provisions of the treaties. To put the matter in a nutshell, all
townsites are to be locatedin fact, all in existence have
already been locatedby the Dawes Commission. The town lots
are to be allotted to whoever can establish a valid claim before
the townsite commissions, and all lots that are unclaimed are
to be sold at auction, the money to be turned into the tribal
treasuries. In many of the towns the allotments have already been
made, and some of the sales held. A great majority of the principal
towns, however, are yet to be allotted, and persons who desire
to secure good property for business or manufacturing purposes
in the towns should take note of the public sales, which will
all be duly advertised. Whether bought at one of these sales,
or from the holder of the deed after all claims have been settled,
titles on town property will be entirely free from any restrictions
from the beginning. While the practical benefit to the Indians
of the equalization undertaken by the Dawes Commission, viewed
broadly, may well be doubted, it affords a remarkably good means
of determining the character of the 20,000,000 acres of tribal
lands, that comparatively unscathed empire toward which so many
eager eyes are now turned. A general impression seems to prevail
that the Indian Territory is almost entirely prairie. As a matter
of fact, about 65 per cent of the present area is timbered land.
The general character of the landscape does not materially differ
from large portions of Indiana, Illinois or Missouri. While there
are, particularly in the northern part, wide stretches of prairie,
the river bottoms and almost the whole of the Choctaw and Chickasaw
nations are liberally supplied with a fine growth of timber. The
general topography is an undulating upland, plentifully watered
by the great streams of the Arkansas, Canadian and Red Rivers,
and their numerous tributaries. The river bottoms, of which there
are millions of acres, are equal in richness to any in the world,
while the prairies and upland are of almost equal fertility.
Notwithstanding that less than one-sixth of the land is now
being cultivated, the output of agricultural products is so great
that the railroads are pushed to handle the surplus. The demand
for cars at all shipping points is so great that shippers are
compelled to file applications weeks in advance, and then await
their turn. One day recently that I spent at Vinita, in the Cherokee
Nation, 700 wagon loads of corn were brought to town, and the
daily average at this season is from 200 to 300 loads. It is not
uncommon for wagons to stand all night at the mills waiting for
a chance to unload. The shipments of hay from this same place
are also astonishing. Stations where one would scarcely expect
trains to stop, so few are the external evidences of population,
to say nothing of life, send out daily several car loads of produce.
In the more southern portion of the territory, cars to handle
the cotton crop can be secured only with difficulty, although
all the railroads in the Territory are making every effort to
meet the demands of traffic. Think of this, and the earth hardly
scratched. One would expect, as is the case in most new countries,
that the imports would greatly exceed the exports. Already the
reverse is true of the Territory. The "empties," as
railroad men call unloaded cars, are hauled into, not away from,
the Territory. This curious reversal of the ordinary course of
traffic is a surprise, and somewhat of a puzzle, to railroad operators,
and they are already wondering what they will do when the country
is settled. However, railroad construction is being pushed everywhere
with extraordinary activity, and there is no doubt that the problem
will be solved.
As would naturally follow, the compliment to this agricultural
production is to be found in the obvious commercial activity that
everywhere pervades the towns. In this connection, a somewhat
curious condition is apparent. It is estimated that four-fifths
of the present population of the Territory resides in the towns.
This seeming disproportion, in a country where manufactures are
as yet a minor element in industry, would indicate that a majority
of the people are "living off each other," as a resident
put it. Yet there is no evidence of the stagnation that would
be the inevitable result if that situation really existed. The
capital that is daily coming in with the tide of immigration is
probably what preserves the balance now, but bankers and those
in touch with the business situation profess to feel not the slightest
uneasiness as to the ultimate outcome. They confidently predict
that development will keep pace with the immigration, the concentration
of the population in the towns being more apparent than real,
and due to the fact that the country is passing through a critical
formative period, and that production will more than equalize
matters before any strain is felt. Observing conditions on the
spot, I am inclined to accept this explanation as a just one.
There are not apparent, either on the surface or in the forthcoming
sequence of events, any indications of a reaction. The present
rate of development in the Territory is sound, for the land is
here to support it.
For purposes of appraisement, the Dawes Commission has classified
all the lands in the Territory according to schedules. The land
in the Seminole Nation, which is not extensive, was divided into
only three grades, and allotted on that basis. However, in the
other four nations the land was of such extent and diversity of
character that more minute divisions were deemed necessary. The
remainder of the Territory was divided into two parts, one consisting
of the Cherokee and Creek Nations, and the other of the Choctaw
and Chickasaw nations, and a schedule for each devised to fit
the land as near as possible. I believe these schedules will be
of value to persons anticipating a location in the Territory,
especially if they intend to cultivate a farm, and so I will insert
them.
Following is the classification schedule for the Creek and
Cherokee nations:
Class 1. Natural open bottom land.
Class 2. Best black prairie land.
Class 3 (a). Bottom land covered with timber and thickets.
Class 3 (b). Best prairie land other than black.
Class 4 (a). Bottom land subject to overflow.
Class 4 (b). Prairie land, smooth and tillable.
Class 5 (a)- Rough land free from rocks.
Class 5 (b). Rolling land free from rocks.
Class 6 (a). Rocky prairie land.
Class 6 (b). Sandy prairie land.
Class 7 (a). Alkali prairie land.
Class 7 (b). Hilly and rocky land.
Class 8 (a). Swamp land.
Class 8 (b). Mountain pasture land.
Class 9 (a). Mountain land, sandy loam.
Class 9 (b). Mountain land, silicious.
Class 10 (a). Rough and rocky mountain land.
Class 10 (b). Flint hills.
The following table shows the lands of the Creek nation,
as classified under the above schedule. Fractions of acres are
omitted.
|
Acres |
Class 1 |
12,410 |
Class 2 |
1,739 |
Class 3 (a) |
194,596 |
Class 3 (b) |
124,400 |
Class 4 (a) |
112,385 |
Class 4 (b) |
571,803 |
Class 5(a) |
298,507 |
Class 5 (b) |
770,756 |
Class 6 (a) |
202,744 |
Class 6 (b) |
46,783 |
Class 7 (a) |
31,135 |
Class 7 (b) |
512,282 |
Class 8 (a) |
25,469 |
Class 8 (b) |
91,310 |
Class 9 (a) |
15,477 |
Class 9 (b) |
1,464 |
Class 10 (a) |
59,546 |
TOTAL |
3,072,813 |
The following table gives the lands of the Cherokee Nation,
as classified under the schedule, fractions omitted.
|
Acres |
Class 1 |
11,646 |
Class 2 |
1,623 |
Class 3 (a) |
143,836 |
Class 3 (b) |
231,900 |
Class 4 (a) |
213,903 |
Class 4 (b) |
899,207 |
Class 5(a) |
322,555 |
Class 5 (b) |
634,948 |
Class 6 (a) |
414,899 |
Class 6 (b) |
5,673 |
Class 7 (a) |
7,700 |
Class 7 (b) |
614,362 |
Class 8 (a) |
15,540 |
Class 8 (b) |
159,394 |
Class 9 (a) |
12,062 |
Class 9 (b) |
41,142 |
Class 10 (a) |
220,341 |
Class 10 (b) |
469,330 |
TOTAL |
4,420,070 |
Following is the classification schedule for the Choctaw
and Chickasaw nations:
Class 1. Natural open bottom land.
Class 2 (a). Cleared bottom land.
Class 2 (b). Best black prairie land.
Class 3. Bottom land covered with timber and thickets. (If the
timber is of commercial value, it will be appraised separately.)
Class 4 (a). Best prairie land, other than black.
Class 4 (b). Bottom land subject to overflow.
Class 5 (a). Prairie land, smooth and tillable.
Class 5 (b). Swamp land easily drainable.
Class 6 (a). Rough prairie land.
Class 6 (b). Upland with hard timber. (If the timber is of commercial
value, it will be appraised separately.)
Class 7 (a). Rocky prairie land.
Class 7 (b). Swamp land not easily drainable.
Class 8 (a). Alkali prairie land.
Class 8 (b). Hilly and rocky land.
Class 8 (c). Swamp land not profitably drainable.
Class 8 (d). Mountain pasture land.
Class 9 (a). Sandy land with pine timber. (If the timber is of
commercial value, it will be appraised separately.)
Class 9 (b). Mountain land with pine timber. (If the timber is
of commercial value, it will be appraised separately.)
Class 10. Rough mountain land.
The following table shows the lands of the Choctaw nation,
as classified under the above schedule, fractions of acres omitted.
|
Acres |
Class 1 |
1,065 |
Class 2 (a) |
3,399 |
Class 2 (b) |
35,235 |
Class 3 |
286,190 |
Class 4 (a) |
89,764 |
Class 4 (b) |
281,234 |
Class 5(a) |
526,187 |
Class 5 (b) |
21,281 |
Class 6 (a) |
129,020 |
Class 6 (b) |
2,134,427 |
Class 7 (a) |
145,313 |
Class 7 (b) |
37,787 |
Class 8 (a) |
19,125 |
Class 8 (b) |
1,390,480 |
Class 8 (c) |
14,665 |
Class 8 (d) |
289,276 |
Class 9 (a) |
265,594 |
Class 9 (b) |
765,895 |
Class 10 |
514,296 |
TOTAL |
6,950,043 |
The following table gives the lands of the Chickasaw nation,
as classified under the schedule, fractions omitted.
|
Acres |
Class 1 |
83,176 |
Class 2 (a) |
15,014 |
Class 2 (b) |
29,974 |
Class 3 |
145,458 |
Class 4 (a) |
173,026 |
Class 4 (b) |
182,819 |
Class 5(a) |
1,505,116 |
Class 5 (b) |
12,381 |
Class 6 (a) |
223,800 |
Class 6 (b) |
1,748,513 |
Class 7 (a) |
191,995 |
Class 7 (b) |
3,673 |
Class 8 (a) |
22,285 |
Class 8 (b) |
307,962 |
Class 8 (c) |
2,214 |
Class 8 (d) |
53,181 |
Class 9 (a) |
0 |
Class 9 (b) |
0 |
Class 10 |
2,512 |
TOTAL |
4,703,108 |
From this classification it appears that about four-fifths
of the total area of the Territory is arable, and most of the
remainder is valuable for other purposes. A large part of the
land not classed as arable is designated as swamp land, susceptible
to drainage, so there is no doubt that in time it will be reclaimed
and added to the producing part of the Territory. In fact, it
is highly probable that this land may become exceedingly valuable,
for it is peculiarly adapted for the culture of rice, which industry
is being the means of reclaiming the swamp lands of Louisiana
and eastern Texas. It is said that rice growers already have their
eyes on this country, with a view to developing it as soon as
they can secure possession under valid leases. Much of the land
is very valuable for its timber and for other natural resources,
such as coal and oil deposits, which are to be found almost everywhere
in the Territory, and the great shale deposits at Sapulpa, which
are already the foundation upon which great manufacturing enterprises
are being predicated. The whole of the Territory lies well within
the rain belt, and the impression that has got abroad that this
is an arid country is entirely erroneous. Severe droughts are
rare, even more so than in the neighboring states of Missouri,
Kansas and Texas. The notion that the country has a deficient
rainfall probably arises out of the false impression that it is
poorly timbered, which I have already shown to be incorrect. The
tables given are the result of the work of skilled observers,
who covered every mile of the Territory and examined every acre
of the land, and may be depended upon to delineate the character
of the lands with reasonable accuracy. As to climate, it is very
similar to that of Tennessee, the winters being mild, with very
little snowfall, and the summers of moderate heat.
As yet the land has not been appraised; that is, no value in
dollars and cents has been placed upon the various grades, except
in the small Seminole country. It will not be long, however, before
this appraisement is made, and when it is, it will enable one
to get a very fair idea of the value of the land, if one fully
understands the system under which the valuations are determined.
The rules governing the classification of the lands give a clue
to the method employed. These rules follow:
1. Lands shall be valued in the appraisement as if in their
original condition, excluding improvements.
2. Appraisers will grade and appraise lands without regard
to their location and proximity to market.
3. Land will be graded and appraised by quarter sections except
in cases where a part of a quarter is of a. different grade from
the rest. In such cases of the quarter sections will be graded
and appraised in smaller parcels, but no parcel to be less than
40 acres.
4. If timber is of commercial value, the quantity will be carefully
estimated and the variety stated, and it will be valued separately;
and if not generally distributed over the tracts, its location
will be given.
5. Upon completion of this work the values will be adjusted
by the Commission to the Five Civilized Tribes on the basis of
the values fixed for each class and the location of the lands
and their proximity to market.
Given the rules governing the classification, the classification
tables, the classification schedules, and the definite appraisement,
all of which, except the appraisement, are here reproduced, and
a prospective purchaser of lands in the Territory will be able
to determine with tolerable accuracy the character and value of
a piece of land in any locality.
Of course, he must first learn how the land he fancies is classified,
and that can be done by referring to the completed allotment lists
of the Dawes Commission, whenever those lists are completed. Moreover,
by a judicious study of the tables, one may without difficulty
select approximately the kind of land one desires. Do you desire
natural open bottom land? There is a certain stated amount to
be had, and a little inquiry will reveal where it is located.
Do you prefer black prairie land? You will find it classified
and marked out for your inspection. Are you looking for heavily
timbered land on which to operate a saw mill, or mountain pasture
land on which to locate a goat ranch? Both are available. In fact,
you can pay your money and take your choice. And, bear in mind,
this estimate of the character and value of the lands is not that
of the proprietor, but that of impartial experts employed by the
United States government. It is to be presumed that appraisements
will not represent actual market values, but will be within the
usual limitation imposed by similar circumstances. It is probable
that the appraisement will be comparative rather than specific,
for its only object is to afford a basis of comparison on which
to equalize the allotments, but it will nevertheless give a considerable
insight into actual values as conditions are today, with the exceptions
as to improvements and locality noted by the rules. Those are
advantages to be weighed by prospective purchasers, and will fluctuate
in value according to individual desires.
Within the year just past, thousands of persons have taken
advantage of favorable opportunities afforded by the railroads
entering the Territory to inspect the country. I have encountered
these "prospectors" everywhere. Few, indeed, are disappointed
with what they see, but I find that many had before coming an
erroneous impression as to the conditions under which the Territory
is soon to be thrown open to settlement. Many thought that, as
soon as the Dawes Commission has finished its work, the lands
may be purchased outright. Some, when they learn the facts, feel
a sense of disappointment and are somewhat averse to locating
upon land they cannot, at least for a time, own. That this consideration
will cause many who had entertained a project to remove to the
Territory to change their mind, or defer moving in the matter,
is certain. In a country where no man is so poor but he may, if
he really wishes to own some land, many are disinclined to settle
upon ground to which they do not hold a title. However, unless
one is swayed chiefly by sentimental considerations, such objections
must fall to the ground in this instance. Owing to the fact that
the lands of the small tribes that occupy the Quapah Agency, in
the northeast part of the Territory, have been allotted for over
ten years under almost exactly similar provisions as will obtain
in the Five Nations, we may observe how the system operates when
put into practice. Nearly all the land in the Quapah Agency is
cultivated by white persons under leases, and the arrangement
has worked with complete satisfaction to all parties concerned.
Take the Five Nations. Here practically all the land that is
in cultivation has been tilled by white men, the interlopers whose
presence gave perpetual offense. These lands were cultivated under
conditions where not even valid leases could be obtained, where
all improvements became the property of the tribes, and where
the tenants were in constant fear of eviction which they would
have been powerless to resist. Yet the lands found men willing
to cultivate them. What more need be said? There is no scarcity
of land as yet in the United States. There is land in plenty.
But some is more desirable than others. The fact that white amen
cultivated the Indian lands under insecure tenure, or no tenure
at all, is absolute proof that they found it profitable to do
so. If they found it profitable under no tenure, is it not reasonable
to assume that under secure leaseholds, with a prospect of eventual
possession, it will also be profitable? Moreover, conditions are
vastly more favorable in other respects. Formerly this region
was isolated from the world's markets. Now it is rapidly becoming
a network of railway lines. Within five years a railroad map of
the Territory will look like a spider's web. If the present rate
of construction continues, and there is no doubt that it will.
Five great systems now reach, the Territory, and all have the
building fever. The railroads are getting into shape to handle
the traffic that will result when the additional million, expected
to arrive within the next ten years, gets on the ground and to
work.
So the "prospector" who comes to the Territory now
will have no just cause to regret his journey. He is a seeker
for opportunity, and opportunity is here. If he be a farmer looking
for land, he may find himself just a little ahead of time, but
to be ahead of time is generally estimated an advantage. The man
who is ahead of time is infinitely better off than the man who
is behind time. But is the "prospector" who comes to
the Territory now ahead of time? I should say, decidedly not.
A man does not, or should not, change his home without good cause.
He must see, or think he sees, a fair chance to better his condition.
If he is wise, he will "prospect" a little before taking
the plunge; and if he expects his "prospecting" trip
to result in anything, he must certainly not be behind time, or
he will find that others have seized the opportunity he sought,
while it was yet newborn from the womb of progress.
In a short time, now, this fertile region will open its arms
to embrace the men whose destiny is to convert its teeming resources
to the uses of mankind. It is, indeed, fortunate that this brief
interim will intervene. It means that homeseekers will have ample
opportunity to look over the ground, decide upon a location, and
prepare for removal. It means that the new territory will not
start handicapped by the unsettled conditions that always follow
a "rush." Its "boom" will be more gradual,
but will lose no impetus on that account. The foundations are
well laid, the results certain. I have had occasion, during the
past few years, to traverse a large part of the earth's surface,
and if I were asked today to name the locality most likely in
my opinion, to enjoy during the forthcoming decade the most substantial
development, I should, without hesitation, reply:
"The Indian Territory."
Frisco System | Stories Page
| Contents Page
|